Parivrtta Trikonasana was never mentioned by K. P. Jois in his book: “Yoga Mala”, even one of the newest editions. It makes you wonder the importance of the pose and why it made it into the sequence we know today. Was it added to suit the western needs? abilities? egos? I guess we will never really know the real answer. Research shows so many reasons and opinions to why things were added or removed from the sequence.
Like Uttihita Trikonasana, it has five vinyasas, of which the 2nd and 4th are the states of the asana. Does the twist offer more in terms of benefit to the digestive system? Even if it does, K.P. Jois felt it neccessary to leave out of his book. Then the questions arises, should it be left out of your sequence?







</